For many cities and settlements that surrendered peacefully, the Islamic conquest was marked by generous terms, allowing them to retain property and continue practising their culture and religion. By the 4th century AH / 10th century CE, most of the settled population had embraced Islam. The transition led to the rise of successive empires and dynasties, each contributing to the development of the region. New administrative systems necessitated the construction of new kinds of monumental buildings: mosques, madrasas and mausolea. These new spaces not only symbolised the shift in governance but also transformed the urban and architectural fabric of the region.
Earthenware architecture dominated Uzbekistan’s historical built environment and continues to impress visitors today. These Islamic architectural principles inspired Modernist design in the 20th century.
Conquerors and Patrons
Historians consider that the lands within Uzbekistan twice experienced an ‘Islamic Renaissance': first under the Samanid dynasty of the 4th century AH / 10th century CE, then again in the 8th–10th centuries AH / 14th–15th centuries CE under the Timurids. The Samanids, ruling on behalf of the caliphate in Baghdad, transformed the cities of Bukhara and Samarqand into thriving centres of trade, scholarship and culture, attracting poets, scientists and intellectuals. In the wake of the crumbling Mongol empire (7th–8th c. AH / 13th–14th c. CE) rose Timur (or Tamerlane), who turned these cities into the glittering symbols of Islamic power and cultural achievement known in Transoxiana today.
Cities of the Earth
Earthenware was the dominant building material for monumental architecture in Uzbekistan, as stone and timber were scarce in the region. Buildings with an earthen core were faced with brick and tiles. Limited materials fostered creative ingenuity: glazed and unglazed bricks formed a surprising variety of intricate patterns through variations in grouping, rotation and spacing. Bricks also formed calligraphic messages imparting Quranic passages, declarations of faith and allegiances to rulers. Established under the Samanids, these architectural traditions continued through the Timurid period and into early modernity, with the same techniques still emphasised today. Many iconic historical buildings remain standing, restored to splendour by government-led reconstructive efforts in the late 20th century. Among these are the mausoleum of the Samanid dynasty in Bukhara and the Bibi Khanym Mosque in Samarqand.
Funereal Architecture
Of all the new architectural forms developed under Islam, the mausoleum is most emblematic of Islamic Central Asia. Mausolea frequently contain cenotaphs (‘empty tombs’) to serve as symbolic grave markers, while the deceased rests in the ground beneath. The Shah-i Zinda (‘living king’) necropolis in Samarqand, containing more than twenty buildings, was constructed over eight centuries and is the final resting place of relatives of Timur, among others.
Modernist Architecture
Uzbekistan’s capital, Tashkent, was largely destroyed by an earthquake in 1966. The reconstruction of the city conceived Tashkent as an exemplary Central Asian capital – a convergence of socialist ideology and local traditions. Modernist architects leant on Islamic principles of design established in centuries prior to shape administrative buildings, arts venues and institutions, a hotel and even some of Tashkent’s metro stations. In July 2026, UNESCO inscribed ten of these monumental structures on the World Heritage List under the title ‘Tashkent Modernist Architecture: Modernity and Tradition in Central Asia’.
Architects of Thought and Image